GMAT考试-Testprep数学精解(8)
“If I eat nuts, then I break out in hives.” This in turn can be symbolized a s N——>H. Next, we interpret the clause “there is a blemish on my hand” to mean “hives ,“ which we symbolize as H. Substituting these symbolssintosthe argument yie lds the following diagram: N——>H H Therefore, N The diagram clearly shows that this argument has the same structure as the g iven argument. The answer, therefore, is (B)。 Denying the Premise Fallacy A——>B ~A Therefore, ~B The fallacy of denying the premise occurs when an if-then statement is prese nted, its premise denied, and then its conclusion wrongly negated. Example: (Denying the Premise Fallacy) The senator will be reelected only if he opposes the new tax bill. But he wa s defeated. So he must have supported the new tax bill. The sentence “The senator will be reelected only if he opposes the new tax b ill“ contains an embedded if-then statement: ”If the senator is reelected, t hen he opposes the new tax bill.“ (Remember: ”A only if B“ is equivalent to “If A, then B.”) This in turn can be symbolized as R——>~T. The sentence “But the senator was defeated“ can be reworded as ”He was not reelected,“ which in turn can be symbolized as ~R. Finally, the sentence “He must have support ed the new tax bill“ can be symbolized as T. Using these symbols the argumen t can be diagrammed as follows R——>~T ~R Therefore, T [Note: Two negatives make a positive, so the conclusion ~(~T) was reduced to T.] This diagram clearly shows that the argument is committing the fallacy of denying the premise. An if-then statement is made; its premise is negated ; then its conclusion is negated. Transitive Property A——>B B——>C Therefore, A——>C These arguments are rarely difficult, provided you step back and take a bir d's-eye view. It may be helpful to view this structure as an inequality in m athematics. For example, 5 > 4 and 4 > 3, so 5 > 3. Notice that the conclusion in the transitive property is also an if-then sta tement. So we don't know that C is true unless we know that A is true. Howev er, if we add the premise “A is true” to the diagram, then we can conclude t hat C is true: A——>B B——>C A Therefore, C As you may have anticipated, the contrapositive can be generalized to the tr ansitive property: A——>B B——>C ~C Therefore, ~A Example: (Transitive Property) If you work hard, you will be successful in America. If you are successful i n America, you can lead a life of leisure. So if you work hard in America, y ou can live a life of leisure |