LSAT考试模拟试题:LSAT考试试题四d
22. When a planetary system forms, the chances that a planet capable of supporting life will be formed are high. The chances that a large planet the size of Jupiter or Saturn will be formed, however, are low. Without Jupiter and Saturn, whose gravitational forces have prevented Earth from being frequently struck by large comets, intelligent life would never have arisen on Earth. Since planetary systems are unlikely to contain any large planets, the chances that intelligent life will emerge on a planet are, therefore, low Knowing which one of the following would be most useful in evaluating the argument? (A) whether all planetary systems are formed from similar amounts of matter 23. Construction contractors working on the cutting edge of technology nearly always work on a "cost-plus" basis only. One kind of cost-plus contract stipulates the contractor's profit as a fixed percentage of the contractor's costs; the other kind stipulates a fixed amount of profit over and above costs. Under the first kind of contract, higher costs yield higher profits for the contractor, so this is where one might expect final costs in excess of original cost overruns are actually more common if the contract is of the fixed-profit kind. Which one of the following,if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox in the situation described above? (A) Clients are much less likely to agree to a fixed-profit type of cost-plus contract when it is understood that under certain conditions the project will be scuttled than they are when there is no such understanding. 24. That wall is supported by several joists, The only thing that can have caused the bulge that the wall now has is a broken joist. Therefore, at least one of the joists is broken. Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its logical features to the argumetn above ? (A) At least one of the players in the orchestra must have made a mistake, since nothing else would have made the conductor grimace in the way she just did. Questions 25-26 Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person's character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses. Gregory: You are right tha the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analysts form making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment. 25. Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha's argument? (A) He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha's recommendation. 26. Which one of the following,if true, would provide Sasha with the strongest counter to Gregory's response? (A) Courts routinely use means other than handwriting analysis to provide evidence of a person's character. |