2007年8月31日 人有病,看基因?
你的感情是否容易受到伤害?你是否觉得在嘈杂的环境中难以进行交谈?你的母亲是否健在?你一般在头部哪一侧使用手机? Are your feelings easily hurt? Do you find it difficult to follow a conversation if there is background noise? Is your mother still alive? On what side of the head do you usually use a mobile phone? These are just some of the questions being asked as part of the UK’s largest and most ambitious health study looking at the relationship between certain genes, lifestyles and health. The study is being carried out by the UK Biobank, a government initiative, which plans to collect DNA samples from 500,000 people aged between 40 and 69 across the UK. Collecting large sample groups of genetic information, together with data on lifestyle choices and genealogy, is aimed at enhancing the understanding of the genetic causes of hereditary diseases such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes and certain mental problems. Recruitment for the project started in spring and so far about 10,000 people have donated 40ml-50ml of blood and urine in assessment centres round the country. The initiative has received £61m in funding from the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, the Department of Health and the Scottish Executive. A similar project was carried out in Iceland, where the 300,000 population has unusually homogenous DNA. The compressed gene pool is a direct result of the country’s geographical isolation, making it an invaluable resource for studying inherited diseases. More than half of Iceland’s population has donated DNA or detailed medical records and at the end of the past decade Iceland became the first country in the world to sell the rights to the entire population’s genetic code to a biotechnology company. Supporters of the UK project hope that in future doctors will be able accurately to pinpoint a person’s risk of developing a particular disease, based on their genetic predisposition. Rory Collins, UK Biobank’s principal investigator, says: “Researchers over the next 10, 20 or 30 years can study the causes of disease and identify ways to treat and prevent it.” The UK project will hold named records. Volunteers must fill out an extensive questionnaire, give blood and urine samples and provide their name, address, sex, National Health Service number, date of birth and general practitioner. But storing detailed genealogical, medical and genetic material in a database is proving controversial. Critics say the project is unethical and open to abuse, and raises serious privacy issues. Helen Wallace, director of GeneWatch UK, a not-for-profit policy research company, says: “One major privacy concern is that under current law the police can seek access to the database if they can successfully argue it is in the public interest. “There is also a longer-term concern about insurers and employers. If we can develop a way of identifying those at high genetic risk the likes of insurance companies and employers will be very interested to get their hands on this information.” Prof Collins said he was “very opposed” to the resources being used for such purposes and would fight “vigorously” to prevent it. The concept of “genetic discrimination” currently lies in the realm of science fiction. It was explored in the film Gattaca, in which life expectancy and susceptibility to disease are ascertained at birth and society discriminates on that basis. Opponents of the UK Biobank believe genetic discrimination is a logical consequence of classifying people according to their genes and are calling for legislation to be introduced. The Biobank is a public entity but under current law companies – including foreign researchers and organisations – can gain access to the research and claim intellectual property rights on their findings including genes they link with particular diseases. Prof Collins says: “We are building a resource to help improve health and that includes collaborating with academia and commercial researchers. It is increasingly difficult to discriminate between pure academic and pure commercial research.” Ms Wallace says: “This is highly controversial: whether a company should be able to own information about life, or whether it should be publicly available.” She adds: “Furthermore, genetic research has not been delivering the expected results. Genetic differences are turning out to be less important in common diseases than initially thought. So the idea that the Biobank will work out who is at risk of cancer and heart disease based on DNA is questionable.” But research organisations and pharmaceutical companies have shown great interest in the biobanking industry. Partners and sponsors include GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Merck. Prof Collins stresses that altruism alone motivates participants. He says: “There is nothing in it for those who take part. There is no feedback and this is not a health check. It is simply about people giving.” |